Stanford (Calif.) Well being Care and an staff union are disputing over a November poll initiative to position a 15 p.c cap on health facility fees in Palo Alto, Calif., The Stanford Day-to-day reported.
Seven issues to understand:
1. The poll initiative, to begin with filed in Might, would position a 15 p.c cap at the quantity Palo Alto-based hospitals can rate in way over direct affected person care prices. Hospitals, scientific clinics and different suppliers in Palo Alto must refund payers for fees exceeding the 15 p.c cap inside 180 days of every fiscal yr.
2. The Provider Staff World Union-United Healthcare Employees West backed the measure. It represents healthcare staff at Stanford Well being Care — which has a first-rate campus in Palo Alto.
three. Stanford College introduced its opposition to the measure in a Sept. 28 observation.
The measure “would threaten Stanford Well being Care’s talent to supply top-quality healthcare to sufferers from Palo Alto and around the area,” officers stated.
“This sort of coverage is estimated to cut back Stanford Well being Care’s funds by means of 25 p.c, requiring vital cutbacks and the conceivable closure of many services and products and methods which might be crucial to top of the range healthcare within the native space.”
four. Union spokesperson Sean Wherley argued the measure will supply duty for native healthcare suppliers and town, in keeping with the record.
“That is about transparency [and] letting other people know the way a lot [they] are being charged, and why [they] are being charged so a lot more than the sanatorium down the road or within the neighboring group,” he advised The Stanford Day-to-day. “That is our probability as a company to get healthcare prices underneath regulate.”
five. The union has additionally taken factor with Stanford Well being Care’s earnings, however the machine stated those are important sources to handle its experts, amenities and group get advantages program, and that the machine invests all its benefit margin.
6. Palo Alto Town Council individuals voted this summer season to oppose the measure. In step with the record, they attributed the verdict not to having ok bureaucratic infrastructure to keep watch over healthcare fees from native suppliers.
7. As of Oct. three, the political motion committee of the union and the opposition committee — Offer protection to Our Native Hospitals and Well being Care — had spent a blended $1.eight million at the measure.
Pottstown Sanatorium nurses ratify exertions deal
UPMC staff strike; nonunion health facility staff release political motion committee
UPMC staff set to strike in Pittsburgh
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2018. Excited by LINKING to or REPRINTING this content material? View our insurance policies by means of clicking right here.